Brett's Media and Education Forum

The place for the sharing of ideas and research on the relationship of Media and Education.

Friday, March 24, 2006

What!? A Blog!?

A What!? Blog!?
Technology is a tool that assists in the facilitation of an idea. That’s what I share with my students in Mass Communications and in Education classes. Mass Communications students need to learn how to move from passive consumers, to active participants in the ‘knowledge economy’.
Students can identify various forms of communication, and can identify their consumption patterns, to a limited extent. However, many of them don’t realize that the some of the same technology that’s available to the large media outlets, is also available to them as individuals.
“Technological innovation has again changed the face of mass media.... Cable, satellites, fiber-optic technologies and especially computers have helped create an explosion in media products and formats,” Croteau and Hoynes suggests in their book Media & Society. The authors also suggest that audience fragmentation is encouraged by these technologies creating a ‘new’ world of ‘narrowcasting’.

This concept of narrowcasting offers an opportunity in the classroom to engage students more effectively. An instructor can direct the students to use familiar tools(email and online communities) to interact in with media. Our Mass Media and Society Class is using blogging as tool.

There was research available to support this way f thinking. According to a report from the Pew internet and American life Project, approximately 21 million of 12-17 year olds, or roughly 87%, use the internet. The report also states 33% of that same age group share their own creative content online including; artwork, photos, stories, or videos.

David Warlick, a noted technology advocate, places the use of technology in the classroom in context by connecting elements of information to literacy skills. Warlick breaks the concept down into three fundamental elements of information; networked, digital, and overwhelming.

Warlick shared some of his insights with me during a visit in 2002. One of the concepts that impacted me initially was “Content is increasingly conversational.” The notion that there were ‘gatekeepers’ that solicited, collected, edited, and distributed content is fading rapidly due to the availability of affordable technology. The new technology also required minimal technical skill.


Writing in the classroom can be intimidating for many students, but, ask them to write about something in their world, or from their point of view, they tend to participate more. I recently discovered this academic year.

I noticed during class that many students would visit ‘online communities’ such as ‘facebook’ during class-time; we meet in a computer lab. The students were sharing pictures, exchanging instant messages, and generally socializing(connecting) while in class. This was an opportunity to connect with the students.

When the students were asked about ‘blogging’ , or how many had websites, or personal webpages, many of them stated that they didn’t have either. When asked how many of them had facebook.com accounts all but two students raised their hand. They didn’t make the connection.

“When students are actively engaged and involved in a task, learning is a likely result.,” according to a 1994 study, Student Engagement Report #24, by the Apple Company. The task was to get the students to engage.

The students to asked to go to blogspot.com , think of a screename and password, then write a brief summary, or feedback about what they had learned in the class so far. Then select the publish button on the page. They had a chance to discuss what they posted. The students were then asked “What is a Blog?”

Many of the students didn’t realize that they had just made the transition from passive consumers of Media, to active participants in the media in less than 20 minutes. They also realized the online communities are allowing them participation on a daily basis.

Friday, November 14, 2003

EOTO Project II-Repsonses

Response 1: Minjeong's EOTO on Sharing or Stealing?: Copyright, Digital Technology, and the Internet.

Minjeong started with pointing out that 'Digital technology' offers opporuntities, great opportunities. One of the biggest opportunities is the elimination of 'distribution costs'. When one 'cost' is reduced in one place usually there is a corresponding benefit to someone(s) and lost of something to some other someone(s). Even the legal folks recognize that 'works' in the digital world are different.(Legal Protection of Digital Information)

Minjeong utilizes examples that many of us understand and are familiar. Also, Minjeong points out one group of the opportunist, file sharing companies, specifically "Napster". She then highlights the group that will pay both in economic terms, but also in control of product terms, the 'copyright holder(s)', specifically music copyright holders and the companies that distribute their product.

As a musician and a consumer I find myself in a bit of a value and ethical conflict whenever I read about this subject. If you can get something free, should you? Especially if over a period of time it will diminish the quality of the product. Minjeong's piece points that it's not an easy answer ethically, morally, economically, or legally.

Response 2: Sandy's Space Cadet's views on **SPAM**.

Thank you Sandy for sharing and codifying SPAM . So many times I hear peolple, especially journalists and many educators, referring to SPAM basically as any unwanted email. Your specific description of Unsolicited Commercial Email(UCE) and Unsolicited Bulk Email(UBE) was much more direct and clear.

I found the article "The new Face of Spam" very enlightening, as Trudeau cites SPAM as a bigger threat to internet usage than viruses, and even hackers. Your five fears resonated with me. I thought i was the only one that was afraid to hit the 'remove' and reply. The cost to manage SPAM is high, it's like calling for pest control in your house, either you kill the bugs one at a time(hit the delete key), or call the exterminator on a regular basis and get rid of a bunch of them at once.

The resources provided by Sandy were very enlightening and insightful. It was like peeling layers back on an onion.

Response 3: Bill's EOTO on Localism and Wireless Internet: Is there a connection?

Bill is so right about mixing things and interesting results. Remember AZT was actually developed as a cancer drug(it's the only analogy I could think of right now... you get the point). The two issues posed by Bill, targeted audiences and local ownership control, to me actually inspire more questions that answers. These two issues also create a complicated issue.

The definition of 'Local' even comes under question, as the wireless distribution becomes more pervasive. Bill provides resources to inform us of the activity happening in the policy arenas, and the economic impact of these two issues. I think the issue is in it's infancy and Bill has framed the key compnents of the issues well.



Friday, October 10, 2003

Blogroll for JOMC 223

This is a temporary placement. As soon as I can find the issue with my format the Blog roll will show above my Useful links area.

Blogroll JOMC 223


Wednesday, October 08, 2003

questia

VERY Useful= O.k. I don't know where this 'World's Largest Online Library' has been, but it's very useful. While looking for a related subject, "Media Violence and it's Impact on Education', I found this like. WOW!

Now that I've mentioned it to a few of my collegues, they look at me like 'where have you been... duh!?'. Well, I've found it now. The only downside is that it's a subscription service, but, we pay for cable don't we?

The Impact of Media and Technology in Schools

Not as Useful= A first glance this is a very useful piece of research by Thomas C. Reeves, Ph.D. As I read it the usefulness to this set of research is minimal, but not marginal. It's benefit is that from an educators viewpoint and it has a good research design.

It's only minimally beneficial in that it doesn't raise many new questions. It doesn't offer any really compelling support to any of the exsisting articles I've come across so far.

I will keep it for my lit review as it has a place in my research.

Culture Without Class

Useful= This was a useful site as it relates the importance of the impact of media in a society. Author Kato Hidetoshi uses a character that is widely known to show how the story structure aids in allowing the character to become popular. In fact the 'Mito Komon' character is a social icon.

Hidetoshi points out that story structure and classification is also important. The 'Mito Komon', while a popular t.v. program, has it's roots in 17th century history. THe program is a 'typical period drama' and it follows a fairly standard plotline. It's the very simple structure that appeals to the masses and contributes to it's popularity. It's that very popularity that allows common values and cultural perspective to be understood by multiple generations.

Anyone heard of Mickey Mouse?

Nationwide Study Answers the Question "What do Parents Want in Television Ratings?'

This entry was as helpful as first appeared. I thought it was a truly research driven site, it's not. It's has a few links that eventually get you to some info, but that info can be retrieved more efficiently on another site.

Understanding The Impact of Media on Children and Teens


This site is a very helpful. It's a site backed by the 'American Academy
of Pediatrics'. The 'Academy' recognizes that children learn
from images they see on t.v. and fiilm, and what they hear on the
radio. The Academy also recognizes the power and immediacy of the
messages. They also indicate that some of the outcomes are a result of
repeated exposure to certain messages such as:



  • conflict resolution

  • use alcohol and cigarettes are seen as acceptable and attractive
    behaviors

  • sex and violence don't have negative consequences


The Media Education Basics were very useful:



  • People create media messages.
    Some has to decide what goes into the message, text and pictures, and
    what to delte.

  • Each media has a distinct
    language and strength
    . When children learn the techniques, they
    go from passive victims to educated comsumers

  • Each person receives and filters
    the messages differently.
    Each person has filters of age,
    culture, prior experience, values, and education to inter[ret and
    process the message.

  • Media messages values and points
    of view
    . Children and their parents can learn that they have a
    choice of accepting the values and messages sent throught the Media
















Friday, October 03, 2003

How to Identify a Great Website for Kids

This an interesting website by the American Library Association. This site provides a framwork to analyze the merits of websites for kids and their parents. They keep the basic criteria to four elements.

Wednesday, October 01, 2003

Media and Education

Ken Freed atakes a look at some of the visions and strategies of the future of the market for educational media. This essay blends economic theory, sociolgy, and sooth-saying all into one analysis, adding a dash of humor to keep you engaged.

FCC Meeting Considers Braodcaster's Public Interests Obligations to Children

This is a press release that was sent out September 13, 2000 notifying the public that The Center was holding the FCC accountable for making sure Digital Television Broadcasters were meeting the needs of children.

Terrorists, Despots, Democracy: What Our Children Need To Know

This is a direct link to a specific article about money awareness. The writer
is a Washington Post Communist, Marguerite Kelly. Ms. Kellywrites a
regular column offering parenting advice. Ms. Kelly's column is referred to
as 'Family Almanac.



Don't Shortchange Children on Financial Lessons

This is a direct link to a specific article about money awareness. The
writer is a Washington Post Communist, Marguerite Kelly. Ms. Kelly
writes a regular column offering parenting advice. Ms. Kelly's column
is referred to as 'Family Almanac.


Wednesday, September 24, 2003





Keywords:

Achievement Gap

Constructivist

Media Literacy

Visual Literacy

Media Diet

Education and Media

School Violence and Media



Web Resources:



Title: Media Awareness Network

URL: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/index.cfm


This is a website that can be used as a resource for teachers
and parents about media and information literacy and uyoung people. This
website is Canadian Based.




Title: Closing the Achievement Gap

URL: http://www.nwrel.org/cnorse/infoline/may97/article5.html


This link connects to a specific article about the
achievement gap in education. This articles outlines some of the important
components of the important issue. The article outlines the importance of
external stakeholders for a child’s development and success in school. The
article is important to the subject of this ‘blog’ for what it doesn’t mention,
the influence of ‘Media’ on the success and achievement of children.



Title: Information Technology and Student Achievement


URL: http://www.norman.mathew.com/t4l.htm


A veteran teacher from Canada writes about the influence
of information on student achievement. He asks questions about
the benefits and costs of increasing the use of information technology
and the effectiveness of information technology in the classroom.